
"Do you think that's the best way to go?" she asked us "locals."
How to answer? Indeed, the printed route did in fact take you through town; and yes, the freeway would be simple and faster driving. But the town path is direct, while the freeway takes you miles out of the way -- a giant loop to the west and then to the south, only then to wind up back east. The town route does, in fact, wind you through city streets, but also along one of the most scenic views around. Meanwhile, the freeway takes you...well...along the freeway.
"The truth is," we told her, "you are going to get there about the same time either way."
"But my sister said I would get there fastest on the freeway."
Well, maybe. I doubt it, but she could be right. I certainly haven't timed it. Even if it is true, I'm not sure it's compelling motivation. There was, after all, more than an hour between the time of this conversation and the announced time the lids would be lifted off the buffet chafing dishes. Either path would get a person there almost an hour early. Is there a lot of incentive to be the first

I frankly don't know which route the guest finally took. She was already there when we arrived, but then we not only took the slow, tedious, stop-lighted but scenic route through town, we stopped off at home on the way to relax and feed the dog. Speed, we determined, was not our priority. Admittedly, we missed a few songs, but there were still plenty of olives.
Whatever honks your horn.
1 comment:
Then there are some of us who choose the freeway, not for speed, but for lack of stoplights ... if the time frame is otherwise equal, I'd prefer the extra miles to avoid the tedium of stop-and-go, plus the convenience of only dealing with one direction of traffic versus several ... ;-)
Post a Comment